Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: New Gov't mammogram recommendations...STUPID GOV'T!


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5514
Date: Nov 17, 2009
RE: New Gov't mammogram recommendations...STUPID GOV'T!
Permalink  
 


ok, not quoting because it gets to long.

I get what you are saying, Tab.

Here is where I was wrong. I was not intending to say the Dr. are the problem or raking in the cash. This is what I was thinking and where I see the problem with insurance.

Pt. needs a hip replacement and the insurance will not cover until it gets worse. So, the Dr. cannot fix something with a simple surgery but has to wait till it gets worse and do a more expensive surgery. This goes on and on. Many of the Dr. I talk to spend so much time trying to get the insurance to cover a pt for the care they need. Then instead of getting the care they need it ends up being above and beyond what they really need because that is the only way to g the ins. to cover it. Does that make sense? That is why I am wondering how it is always the people who screw it up.

I get there is abuse in any system and like you said that will always be there. There will always be people who do not care for themselves. I mean that is the case with anything. People have different priorities, etc. No one can agree all the same on how to raise a child and the same goes for health.

As far as younger people not needing ins. I guess I still do not agree. I mean cancer knows no age. You can have a 5 year old that comes down with an illness and catastrophic ins. is not going to cover that care. I had to have a mammogram at 26 and a lumpectomy. That would not have been covered if I did not have the insurance. I mean I could go on and on with that. That is the whole point of insurance and life insurance, etc. Sure, it is not something everyone will always need or use, but it is needed. People who lose their job and get ill are F*ucked and it should not be like that. Seniors on a fixed income are screwed when their medicine comes to 400 bucks a month and their income is 1000. I mean I do not have the answer. If I did then I would be out there shouting from the roof tops. I really do not think it is just the people who are screwing it up. Do I think there are situations out there like that, sure. I mean you stated examples in your post. I just am not convinced that is the majority.

To address the issue of Dr. being able to say they cannot treat you. Well, that is just so dang slippery. Dr. and medical personal are human. Not all Dr. are good. Not all medical personal are good. It took me 3 Dr. to treat and diagnose my thyroid problem. If I would have listened to my first Dr. who told me at 26 that I need to have my milk duct removed when I went to her about an issue with my breast leaking then I would never have caught the issue that led to the surgery. The surgeon said she was nuts and would not remove the duct and that led me to find another Dr..I guess I understand what you are saying about stupid people who expect Dr. to save them when they abuse their body, but that is the down side to being a Dr.. I would not want a Dr. being the one to play God with my life when another Dr. next door would not agree and find an alternative way to treat something.

As far as the elderly and doing unnecessary treatment. Well, I thought a life directive takes care of that, no? Maybe I am wrong. I do agree that is a shame that happens.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 392
Date: Nov 18, 2009
Permalink  
 

lol @ the hip replacement- this is exactly why my mom hasn't had hers. she is too young to get it.

i'm not sure why i'm coming across as saying younger people don't need insurance. they do, but it should be delivered differently and then more resources could be allocated where they are needed. of course, that is a pipe dream so idk why i ever went off on that tangent.

i agree insurance is def about saving your butt.

and i also think that children should always have insurance. not that it guarantees better outcomes all the time, but i'm just not into children having to suffer for circumstances beyond their control.

we can agree to disagree re: people are the problem. insurance companies are certainly not helping anything.

ex: your primary care doc gets paid sh-t to see you. who is responsible for this? essentially the govt because medicare drives all the reimbursement costs. they reimburse much better for procedures.

it makes no sense to effectively piss on primary care when good primary care can help avoid hosp admissions, etc.

the more i talk about the more i realize that the biggest problem lies with trying to apply a one-size-fits-all approach to an entire country. sort of similar to schools, i suppose.

i think as long as we are trying to find one thing to help everyone, we will consistently fail and i think we definitely need to move away from this idea that everyone is equal. they aren't. which is why i don't think large scale reform is the answer.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5514
Date: Nov 18, 2009
Permalink  
 

tabatha wrote:

 

lol @ the hip replacement- this is exactly why my mom hasn't had hers. she is too young to get it.

i'm not sure why i'm coming across as saying younger people don't need insurance. they do, but it should be delivered differently and then more resources could be allocated where they are needed. of course, that is a pipe dream so idk why i ever went off on that tangent.

i agree insurance is def about saving your butt.

and i also think that children should always have insurance. not that it guarantees better outcomes all the time, but i'm just not into children having to suffer for circumstances beyond their control.

we can agree to disagree re: people are the problem. insurance companies are certainly not helping anything.

ex: your primary care doc gets paid sh-t to see you. who is responsible for this? essentially the govt because medicare drives all the reimbursement costs. they reimburse much better for procedures.

it makes no sense to effectively piss on primary care when good primary care can help avoid hosp admissions, etc.

the more i talk about the more i realize that the biggest problem lies with trying to apply a one-size-fits-all approach to an entire country. sort of similar to schools, i suppose.

i think as long as we are trying to find one thing to help everyone, we will consistently fail and i think we definitely need to move away from this idea that everyone is equal. they aren't. which is why i don't think large scale reform is the answer.

 




I very much agree. I just do not see this happening. I am not sure what will actually happen at this rate.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 662
Date: Nov 18, 2009
Permalink  
 

The hardest thing for me to understand is how people think the government could possibly manage more healthcare when they can't run Medicare or Social Security.

Why not open up the borders and let healthcare be bought anywhere and then your healthcare would be portable. Competition, true competition, would drive down prices. Plus, TORT reform could go a long way in this arena too.

Insurance shouldn't look the same for everyone. I do not need maternity coverage anymore, but I still have to pay for it, for example.

Plus, the government has not way to pay for what they are currently proposing. I think most of the people in Washington have no common sense. They proposal on the senate floor now, would now pay for long term care. Cha-ching.

(Could go on and on but must get the kids to school.)

-- Edited by sbucking on Wednesday 18th of November 2009 08:37:15 AM

__________________
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard